Aggressive Defamation Lawyer 410-598-3535

What makes defamation illegal?

Defamation can be any false information that damages the reputation of another business, person, or organization. Defamation includes both libel and slander. Libel usually refers to defamatory statements which are published or broadcast contrastes with slander that usually refers to verbal defamatory statements whice is more temporary. What is an example of defamation?

Libel & Slander- Elements & Examples of Defamation Cases

A defamation example would be if a customer accused the restaurant owner of food poisoning even though it was not actually the restaurant's food that caused them to be ill. If the customer shared the false information with other customers, the owner could have grounds for a defamation lawsuit.

What makes defamation illegal?

Defamation is any false information that damages the reputation of a business,person, or organization.

Defamation includes both libel and slander. Libel usually refers to defamatory statements which are published or broadcast contrasted with while slander which refers to verbal defamatory statements which is more temporary.

What makes defamation illegal?

Defamation is any false information that harms the reputation of a business, person, or organization. Defamation includes both libel and slander. Libel generally refers to defamatory statements that are published or broadcast. Slander refers to verbal defamatory statements is more temporary..

What legally defines defamation?

Defamation is a statement that injures a third person's reputation. The tort of defamation includes both libel, usually written statements and slander verbal statements. Generally State common law and statutory law governs defamation actions, and each state has different standards for defamation and possible damages.

What are the Legal Requirements of a Defamation Case?

To obtain compensation for defamation, the person who was defamed must prove that the false statements meet certain legal criteria. Because defamation has a very specific legal meaning, a plaintiff who files a defamation lawsuit will need to prove, with the assistance of his or her defamation attorney each of the legal elements of defamation. Defamation requires

A false and defamatory statement of fact

About the plaintiff

Published to a third party and

Resulting in injury to the plaintiff.

The law does not guard against everything that might be defamatory, but only genuine, serious defamation. Our Maryland defamation of character attorneys will consider whether you are a private or a public figure whether there was negligence or actual malice regarding the truth of the statements, the manner of the publication, and any damages to determine whether the harmful statement meets the legal standard of defamation.

Who Can Win Defamation Lawsuits?

Anyone who has been defamed, either a business or an individual, should be able to make a successful claim for defamation. Defamation laws provide the strongest protection for private individuals, so it is harder for public figures to make defamation claims. Public figures must prove actual malice, which is a more difficult standard, but it is a standard that our Maryland defamation attorneys can often help you to meet.

It is also easier to win defamation cases based on intentionally false statements as opposed to merely negligent statements. Winning a defamation case on the basis of a negligent statement about a public figure is not normally possible because actual malice is required, but private individuals could still successfully prevail in defamation lawsuits based on statements that were published or spoken by a speaker who was negligent in determining the truth of the statements.

Defamation Per Se

While plaintiffs in most defamation cases must prove they were damaged in order to prevail in their claims, this is not always true for every type of statements. Some statements are defamatory per se, and in defamation per se cases, Maryland law does not require plaintiff to prove damages, as the damages are assumed. Four categories are defamation per se including:

Stating false facts that tend to injure a plaintiff in his or her business trade or profession

Imputing that a plaintiff is unchaste

Charging a plaintiff with a serious crime

Charging that a plaintiff has a loathsome disease

If you can prove any of these things, you should be able to successfully win a defamation case with help from top Maryland defamation of character lawyers.

Internet Defamation

Because the Internet has become such a popular means of communication, a new category of defamation has emerged: Internet defamation. Internet defamation occurs when false and damaging statements are made using the web. Statements could be made on blogs, websites, social media posts, or any other online venue.

The key to a successful Internet defamation claim will involve proving that defamation per se occurred or that actual damage occurred to the defamed victim’s reputation. Since there are numerous false statements on the Internet, this requirement can be a challenge. Our Maryland Internet defamation lawyers can help you gather evidence so you can make a strong case.

Workplace Defamation

Workplace defamation is another injury than can occur when your character is damaged by one of your business associates. Often, the speaker or writer is a disgruntled customer or a co-worker who may make untrue statements or spread gossip nts to promote his or her own career to the disadvantage of the person who is defamed.

Workplace defamation often has direct financial consequences for the victim, and Maryland workplace defamation lawyers can help by taking appropriate action against the person who has spread false statements in the workplace.

Legal Remedies for Defamation

Once our lawyers firm have proven established that defamation has taken place, there are two avenues of relief for a victim.

If the defamation has occurred in the past, you may be entitled to compensatory relief in the form of a monetary award. If the defamation is currently happening, we can seek an injunction to compel an end to the injurious statements. An injunction is a court order requiring that the defamer stop speaking HARM TO BUSINESS

A false assertion of fact about a business will only be considered to be defamatory if the statement is about efficiency, business credit, financial soundness, reputation, property, or ethics. If this is the case, the statement may prejudice the business in its affairs by deterring third persons from dealing or working with the business. Moreover, if the statement is a false assertion of fact concerning a product, the proper cause of action is not for defamation but rather for injurious falsehood. In addition, words written or spoken about a particular employee, owner, or officer, of a business are not defamatory against the business itself unless the statement directly relates to the business affairs or trade. If the statement relates only to the individual’s person, only that particular individual has standing to allege defamation.

FALSE ABOUT OUR LAW FIRM We are not only very aggressive at seeking justice for our clients who are defamed, we also vigorously defend those who have been falsely accused of defamation.

WHAT IS DEFAMATION?

Everyone has a right for their reputation to be free from damage by false statements. Defamation is a publication not protected by any privilege of a false statement of fact that injures another person’s reputation. The law balances interests between protecting an individual’s freedom of speech on the one hand and protecting the personal reputation of another person on the other.

LIBEL AND SLANDER There is no sharp definition as to what words are defamatory. Some statements may be injurious to some people’s reputations, whereas the same statement may not be injurious to others. Whether a statement qualifies as defamation is determined on a case-by-case basis, and must be evaluated according to what the general public or an average reasonable person would understand the statement to mean.

ELEMENTS OF DEFAMATION The elements for an action of defamation include: a false statement about the plaintiff; publication of the statement to a third party who understands the meaning of the statement; some fault on the part of the defendant such negligence or recklessness as to falsity; and presumed or actual damages suffered by the plaintiff.

. THE PUBLICATION MUST BE READ AS A WHOLE

In determining whether the specific statement is defamatory, the words must not be read out of context; instead, the publication must be read in its entirety. The entire statement, article, statement, piece of literature, or broadcast, must be read. Any alleged defamatory interpretation of a particular statement can be automatically negated by statements immediately preceding or following the statement in question. This caveat includes any explanation that the statement is merely an opinion, not an assertion of fact. Simply, a particular composition must be read in its entirety and not be divided into separate units. This requirement is also applied to chapter titles, headlines, illustrations, and captions.

THE PARTY MUST BE IDENTIFIABLE It is necessary for the plaintiff to prove that he or she is the person to whom the statement was made. It is not necessary to prove that every individual person who receives the material perceives the statement to be made about the plaintiff, but some of the listeners or readers must understand the statement to be about the plaintiff.

The statement does not need to identify the plaintiff by name. The intention of the author and the recognition of the plaintiff that the statement is about the plaintiff is not required. The legal test is whether a third person recipient would reasonably understand that the statement was written or uttered in reference to the plaintiff. This question of fact must be decided by the jury.

Often, words are used broadly to describe a class or group. The statement is defamatory only if the statement can be reasonably understood to be about every member of the particular group a particular member of the group. The larger the class or group, the more difficult it is to prove the likelihood of the statement being about a single member or every member of the particular group.

FICTIONAL CHARACTERS

An author may use fictional characters that may be widely published. The author is under no duty to prevent the possibility that someone may identify with the fictional characters. However, a disclaimer in a fictional work may be a relevant factor in determining the defamatory nature of the work. The disclaimer is not a determining factor, and the work may still be considered defamatory if other factors are present. Nonetheless, an example of a disclaimer should state that any resemblance of a fictional character to an actual persons is purely coincidental

When a person attempts to show resemblances or similarities of the supposedly fictional character, the test is whether a third party recipient could reasonably believe that the character is a portrayal of the plaintiff. The jury must make a comparison between the plaintiff’s characteristics and that of the fictionalized character.

STATEMENT OF FACT

In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be a false statement of fact about the plaintiff. Statements of opinion must be distinguished. Statements that do not consist of facts, but rather are merely the views of the defendant, do not qualify as defamation. Defamation can only consist of a false assertion of fact. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects freedom of expression. Under the Constitution, Statements of opinion are privileged speech and are not actionable as defamation.

FACT VS. OPINION

Whether or not an alleged defamatory statement is an assertion of fact or an opinion is a question of law to be decided by the Court. If the statement has any tendency to be interpreted as an opinion, the jury must decide whether that meaning was actually attributed to it by the recipient so that the statement was in fact considered to be an opinion.

To determine whether a statement is one of fact or opinion, the Courts have devised various tests.

The Contextual Test, also referred to as Totality of the Circumstances Test considers the following factors in determining whether an alleged statement is constitutionally privileged.

While the First Amendment provides broad protection for speech of all types, the protection is not unlimited.

Some words do more than hurt feelings or cause offense, but may cause actual damage. Damage can happen when messages are communicated with the intent of costing individuals or companies business, money, and their reputations.

When this type of message is communicated, it is considered defamation. Defamation is not protected by the First Amendment, and those who are defamed can file a civil lawsuit to recover compensation for the damage caused by the harmful words or to stop the harmful words from continuing to be spoken.

Maryland defamation lawyers have a long track record of defamation lawsuits and can provide representation to any person or business who was harmed by defamatory statements. Our legal team can help you to fight for compensation for any damage to your reputation. HARM TO BUSINESS

A false assertion of fact about a business will only be considered to be defamatory if the statement is about efficiency, business credit, financial soundness, reputation, property, or ethics. If this is the case, the statement may prejudice the business in its affairs by deterring third persons from dealing or working with the business. Moreover, if the statement is a false assertion of fact concerning a product, the proper cause of action is not for defamation but rather for injurious falsehood. In addition, words written or spoken about a particular employee, owner, or officer, of a business are not defamatory against the business itself unless the statement directly relates to the business affairs or trade. If the statement relates only to the individual’s person, only that particular individual has standing to allege defamation.

HARM TO BUSINESS

A false assertion of fact about a business will only be considered to be defamatory if the statement is about efficiency, business credit, financial soundness, reputation, property, or ethics. If this is the case, the statement may prejudice the business in its affairs by deterring third persons from dealing or working with the business. Moreover, if the statement is a false assertion of fact concerning a product, the proper cause of action is not for defamation but rather for injurious falsehood. In addition, words written or spoken about a particular employee, owner, or officer, of a business are not defamatory against the business itself unless the statement directly relates to the business affairs or trade. If the statement relates only to the individual’s person, only that particular individual has standing to allege defamation.

Aggressive and experienced represention for all Defamation, Libel and Slander Cases.

Call 410-598-3535 to find out how much your case is worth.

Aggressive Libel Lawyer